Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andy Dirks's avatar

Also thinking about Washington a bit more, there is definitely a “cultural divide” between urban and rural. It shines through clothing and hobbies. The example of the IPA guzzlers I used was distinctly urban.

Thinking about the Greater Idaho movement in eastern Washington and Oregon reflects a political divide. I’m not sure if its only basis is that people in those regions want lower taxes and less environmental regulations. I’m curious if there is a cultural angle here. Are there insurmountable differences between the cascades that would lead to a breakdown of the state as we know it? Or is it politically based? Can we even separate the two?

Expand full comment
ek's avatar

if skiing is prominent in one part of Austria but not another, then what makes it “very Austrian” instead of “very Gratz”?

The people in Cle Elum and I have very different hobbies, but i wouldn’t call my hobbies or their hobbies any “more Washington”. Maybe i’d call their hobbies “more rural” and mine “more urban”, or maybe “more” or “less affluent”.

Maybe the “more Washington” hobbies are the ones that people outside of Washington think of as unique/special to Washington. Hiking? Boating? Fishing?

Or is it internally decided - maybe it’s the hobbies that the people in WA argue have a big role in the state’s history?

When does a hobby escalate from being a part of a person’s identity? To a community’s identity? To a region’s identity? To a nation’s identity?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts